Four years after its conception by some members of an Abuja parish of 
the Redeemed Christian Church of God, a housing scheme for members of 
the church has taken the appearance of a fraud in the hands of three 
pastors and two sidekicks.

Just
 as doctors occasionally need doctors when ill, pastors sometimes need 
deliverance when in the grip of an affliction. Deliverance–from the 
clutches of the law–is what Peter Imonhiosen, Adeola Oluwafemi Johnson 
and Cosmas Mbanu, all pastors of the Redeemed Christian Church of God, 
RCCG, currently need. Quickly. In the same boat with the pastors are Mr.
 Sunday Adeagbo, a lawyer, and  Mr. Femi Shobola. The five men were 
arrested last month by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, 
EFCC, following a petition that accused them of diversion of funds paid 
by church members for a housing scheme.
Back in 2009, members of 
the Resurrection Chapel, a parish of the Redeemed Church of God in 
Lugbe, Abuja, were presented with the prospect of owning property in the
 Federal Capital Territory, FCT. The project was initiated by a group, 
which calls itself Excellent Men Fellowship. The group kicked off the 
process of acquiring plots of land from the Federal Capital Territory 
Development Authority, FCDA, which has a series of mass housing 
development schemes as a response to the acute accommodation shortage in
 the country’s capital.
The Excellent Men Fellowship, EMF, which 
is made up of adult male members of the Resurrection Chapel and led by 
one Pastor Bisi Akande, urged the entire congregation to support the 
scheme. Like prospectors at a gold rush, members jumped at the 
opportunity. Financial contributions followed.
But before the 
process was completed, Pastor Akande was transferred from the parish 
during the routine transfer exercise of the RCCG. His successor was 
Pastor Imonhiosen. Before Akande left the parish, he turned over the 
bank statements for the contributions for the scheme to Imonhiosen. 
Shortly after Akande’s departure, the FCDA granted approval for and 
allocated parcel of land for an estate at Pyakassa in the Abuja 
Metropolitan Area Council, AMAC.
Things were looking skywards.The
 progress being made attracted members of other RCCG parishes in Abuja. A
 bigger rush to benefit from the initiative followed. Intending 
beneficiaries speedily made requisite payments into the account opened 
by EMF for the purpose. Then came a hitch. The church was unable to take
 possession of the land because of the demand of the original land 
owners, the Gwari people in Pyakassa, for compensation for their farm 
crops. This, though, was quickly resolved. By early 2010, the 
acquisition was completed and the church called a meeting to give 
members who had paid an update.
At the meeting, which held in 
March, 2010, subscribers were told that each of them was entitled to a 
plot measuring 600 square metres. They were also told that no member, 
whatever his position in the church, would own more than one plot. This 
was to ensure that the plots, to be allocated on first-come-first-served
 basis, went round.
Each subscriber was to pay N250,000 net of 
all taxes. Subscribers were directed to pay into an account at the 
defunct Oceanic Bank (which has since been swallowed by EcoBank). The 
account name was RCCG-RC-EMHS (Project), the acronym of Redeemed 
Christian Church of God, Resurrection Chapel, Excellent Men Housing 
Scheme. The account number was 0421701200113.
Within a short 
time, the account started bulging with money. Other meetings on the 
scheme were held at the Resurrection House along 21(F) Road, A Close, 
Federal Housing Authority Estate, Lugbe, Abuja, where the project was 
conceived and initiated.
That was as good as it got, as crisis 
began to brew shortly after. Imonhiosen, under whose tenure the land was
 handed over to the church, was transferred from Resurrection Chapel to 
another parish. He was replaced by one Pastor Adeleye. Imonhiosen was 
said to have been piqued by his transfer. Sources within the church told
 this medium that Imonhiosen, abetted by Shobola, EMF President, and 
Johnson, the chapel’s assistant pastor, who doubles as the Chairman of 
the Resurrection Chapel’s Land Board, launched a plot to wrest the 
control of the scheme from the church.
Church sources said the 
handing over notes Adeleye got from Imonhiosen were devoid of 
information on the  scheme. Adeleye’s efforts to take over the 
leadership of the scheme, as it is customary, were thwarted by Shobola 
and Johnson.
Adeleye was angered by Johnson’s involvement in the 
plot to take the scheme from the church and responded by sending him on 
transfer to a “small” RCCG parish in the Kuje Area Council of the FCT. 
It did not achieve Adeleye’s aim, as Johnson, Shobola, who still 
remained at the parish, and Imonhiosen hung on to the scheme. Shobola 
proceeded to register the scheme as Redeemer Excellent Men Housing 
Foundation, an entity with trustees, at the Corporate Affairs 
Commission. It was issued a Certificate of Incorporation No. CAC/IT/ NO.
 0502. Shobola and his cohorts, naturally, emerged as members of the 
Board of Trustees. This was done with neither the knowledge nor consent 
of subscribers, whose contributions were used to procure the land. With 
this move, the pastors and church leaders removed the project from the 
control of the church.
Their whims began to dictate the direction
 the project would take. The first sign of this came via the alteration 
in the previously announced size of the plots. From the 600 square 
metres initially promised, the size was reviewed to 500 square metres.
Initial
 offer letters given to those who had paid the N250,000 were withdrawn. 
Subscribers were told to return the letters to the EMF executive 
council, which announced an upward cost review to N500,000.
Subscribers
 were also directed to pay another N200,000, which was said to be 30 per
 cent of estimated infrastructure levy. These directives left very 
little wriggle room because it gave a deadline of 30 June, 2010, barely 
one month after the changes were announced. Acceptance of the new terms,
 subscribers were told, was to be sent to Johnson, Chairman of the Land 
Board. This inevitably ensured that the control of the process was 
effectively taken from the Resurrection Chapel, initiator of the scheme.
 Despite not being a member of the parish any longer, he curiously still
 retained his position as head of the project.
The fresh terms 
and conditions notwithstanding, members hurriedly completed payment and 
collected new offer letters dated 30 June 2010. Last year, Augustine 
Eigbe, subscriber with File No. 0451, who left the RCCG in anger over 
the matter, told TheNEWS that subscribers, who had completed their 
payment and had been issued new offer letters, were taken to the land 
for the first time towards the end of 2010. According to Eigbe, they 
were informed that their plot numbers would be sent to them via sms on 
completion of clearing, demarcation and identification of plots.
Eigbe
 claimed that he expected the text message till sometime in April 2011, 
when he was informed that some subscribers had received their plot 
numbers through that medium and had even moved to site to commence 
development. “I was shocked to hear from one of us that some people had 
already moved to site and had started construction, while I was yet to 
receive the sms for my plot number though I had completed my payment of 
N1,030,000 and had been issued with all the receipts,” he said.
It
 was the same with Mr. Oluyemi Ojudu, subscriber with File No. 0744. 
Both subscribers as well as many others were excluded from the 
allocation process. A worker in the church, who was neither given a plot
 number nor allotted any plot despite completing payment, said: “My 
brother, what can I do? As a worker in RCCG, I cannot take them to court
 or even involve the police. It won’t speak well of us as members of the
 church. I leave them to God and surely, God will expose them.”
His wish appears to have been granted.
In
 2011, the pastors invited subscribers to another meeting, where it was 
announced that the cost of the plot allotted had risen to N1.5 million. 
The steep rise was attributed to what the pastors claimed was the high 
cost of infrastructure facilities planned for the estate. All the former
 allocation letters were again withdrawn, with a promise of reallocation
 upon payment of the new rate.
Despite having been tossed up and 
down in the past, subscribers retained hope and went to look for money 
to meet the new terms to avoid losing out.
•The Toyota Hilux truck recovered from the sacked board and retained by the church after washing its hands of the housing scheme
•The Toyota Hilux truck recovered from the sacked board and retained by the church after washing its hands of the housing scheme
That
 turned out to be the last time they would acquiesce to the demands of 
the pastors. Upon full payment of the new rate–for the plots already 
reduced by 100 square metres–many subscribers were denied allocation of 
plots on the excuse that the plots on the estate had been exhausted. It 
did not escape subscribers’ attention that non-members of their parish 
and persons not involved at the beginning were allocated plots after 
paying N4 million per plot. At that time, the pastors had decided to 
sell the land at a commercial rate. Those willing to pay N4 million were
 said to have been allocated more than a plot each, with payments going 
into an entirely new account opened by the pastors.
The pastors 
and their cohorts justified this with the claim that they had to sell 
some of the plots at the commercial rate to enable them fund 
infrastructural development on the estate. They explained that members 
whose plots were not reallocated to them would be considered first in 
another scheme that was in the pipeline.
At one of the meetings 
between subscribers and the management committee, Pastor Johnson 
informed them that his committee had spent N162 million on the estate. 
He claimed that N80 million went into the acquisition of the land, while
 N82 million was expended on perfecting the title. These claims were not
 accompanied by any proof.
On the sale to non-RCCG members at the
 commercial rate–at the expense of fully paid up original 
subscribers–Johnson told his audience that his committee spent N300 
million on the provision of roads, boreholes and erosion control. 
Evidence on the site declined to support these claims.
He then 
pushed his luck too far when he told allottees that they entered into a 
contract with the management committee upon the acceptance of their 
allocation papers and warned them against speaking to the press on 
matters relating to the estate. He then told those who believe they have
 better ideas in the management of such a scheme to go and set up 
theirs.
With that, subscribers flew into rage, yelling and 
violently demanding evidence in support of the claims made, especially 
that of infrastructural development.
The matter spilled into public domain via the press.
Following
 media reports, the General Overseer of RCCG, Pastor Enoch Adeboye, 
dispatched a team led by one Pastor Pitan Adeboye from the church’s 
headquarters to investigate the matter and audit the accounts of the 
project.
To the subscribers’ chagrin,  the investigative panel 
did not invite them. They were also not issued audited reports of the 
scheme’s accounts or copies of the panel’s investigation report.
The
 panel was said to have met with only the pastors and worked with their 
narration of events. Upon the presentation of the report of the panel to
 Adeboye, the General Overseer recommended, among others things, the 
suspension of the “management committee” or “Board of Trustees” of the 
scheme and the borrowing of money from a financial institution to make 
refund to those who paid but got no plots.
Adeboye also directed that a caretaker committee be set up to take over the management of the scheme.
The
 leadership of the church in the North implemented Adeboye’s directives 
and set up a caretaker committee under the leadership of Pastor Amos 
Dele Babade, Provincial Pastor of FCT Province 4, with Mr. Sule Paul, a 
legal practitioner and church leader, as secretary.
With the 
sacking of Imonhiosen, Johnson and their gang members, the caretaker 
committee recovered some of the scheme’s properties. These include a 
brand new Toyota Hilux truck, certificate of incorporation used to 
severe the scheme from the church as well as documents relating to the 
project land and bank statements.
However, the caretaker 
committee displeased subscribers when it announced that funds had been 
sourced to pay off those who missed out on plots, as directed by 
Adeboye. Subscribers angrily asked how the borrowed funds would be 
repaid and by whom since the church had washed its hands off the scheme.
 They also wanted to know how money realised thus far was spent by the 
sacked board before real progress could be made. They feared that 
successful subscribers at the housing scheme would later be asked to 
contribute more money for the repayment of the loan and as such, 
demanded to know how and where the funds were sourced and at what terms 
such would be repaid.
This necessitated another meeting, which 
was attended by a Deputy Inspector-General of Police from the Force 
Headquarters, who was invited by the caretaker committee to forestall 
the outbreak of violence.
At the meeting, the caretaker committee
 explained how members of the ousted management committee frustrated its
 efforts to resolve the crisis by their introduction of an outstanding 
bill of N75 million, which they claimed were owed to contractors for 
work done on the estate. The new bill was submitted by Imonhiosen’s team
 after the caretaker committee said it had secured N40million for the 
reimbursement of those who completed payment, but were not given plots.
The
 caretaker committee accused the sacked board members of deliberately 
frustrating the church’s genuine efforts to take over and resolve the 
issues at the scheme and suggested the arrest of Imonhiosen and his 
gang.
The police duly obliged. But upon their arrest by policemen
 from the Lugbe Police Station, the caretaker committee handed back all 
the recovered items, including bank documents, to the sacked board 
without any explanation.
This irked the subscribers, who accused 
the church leadership of abetting the pastors. Thereafter, the 
subscribers set up a committee to fight their corner. The subscribers’ 
committee challenged the caretaker committee’s handling of the issues 
and demanded a copy of the investigation report as well as the audited 
report sent from the church’s headquarters.
Threats of legal action followed, prompting a disclaimer from the church.
•Another
 section of the estate. Where are the infrastructural developmentOn 15 
May 2013, the disclaimer published in THE PUNCH warned the general 
public that RCCG Region 10 has no hand in the Redeemer Excellent Men 
Housing Foundation (the new name the project was given) and warned that 
the church has no liability for the activities of the operators of the 
scheme. The disclaimer, signed by Sule Paul’s law firm, also warned that
 the use of the name of RCCG on the letterhead and receipt of the scheme
 as well as on the signboards of the scheme’s various sites, was done by
 the operators in their bid to misinform the public. The church, 
however, kept the Toyota Hilux truck it recovered from the ousted 
committee.
It was on account of the dissatisfaction with the way 
the church leadership has handled the matter that some subscribers 
petitioned the EFCC. The petition, signed on behalf of over 200 
subscribers by their lawyer, Rotimi Adalumo, accused the ousted board of
 embezzling about N600 million through series of accounts opened and 
managed by Pastor Johnson and his friends.
It called on the EFCC 
to compel them to render full and detailed account of their stewardship 
from 2009, when the scheme came into being, and retrieve the original 
land documents of the housing scheme from the church officials.
Acting
 spokesman of the EFCC, Wilson Uwujaren, confirmed receipt of the 
petition, but declined further comments because the allegations are 
still being investigated.
An investigation or even prosecution of
 the accused may not deliver the reprieve that subscribers desperately 
seek. This is because the Federal Capital Development Authority deems 
the estate an illegal development and has marked it for demolition. This
 development has provoked further questions on the N82 million the 
pastors claimed was spent on regularising the title to the land.
As
 at press time, Pastor Johnson, who had earlier been fingered in an N8 
million scam at his former post in Calabar, has been released on 
administrative bail. So have Imonhiosen, Adeagbo, Shobola and Mbanu. 
They have been directed to report daily at the EFCC pending conclusion 
of investigations.
When TheNEWS met Johnson last year, he made 
light of the brewing disenchantment over the project. He said there was 
no way a project of that magnitude would not feature dissension, which 
he attributed to disgruntled elements.
On the refusal to refund 
money to subscribers that demanded such, Johnson said he and his team 
were working on giving them their money back. He pleaded that those 
concerned should give him and his colleagues more time to enable them 
sell off some of the remaining plots at commercial rates to raise more 
money to refund.
Adeagbo, who functioned as the scheme’s legal 
officer, also told this magazine last year that they received letters 
from some subscribers asking for refund, but maintained that their 
inability to refund just yet was not enough for some of the “disgruntled
 elements” to want to tarnish the name of the church by rushing to the 
press. He warned that as a lawyer, he would not hesitate to go to court 
if he felt maligned in the press. He is likely to be in court–not to 
fight defamation, but to answer charges of corruption.